Patellar button sizing Introduction (What it is)
Patellar button sizing is the process of selecting the most appropriate size and thickness of a patellar implant (“button”).
It is most commonly discussed during total knee arthroplasty (total knee replacement) when the patella is resurfaced.
The goal is to match the implant to the patient’s patella and overall knee mechanics.
It is a surgical decision step rather than a stand-alone treatment.
Why Patellar button sizing used (Purpose / benefits)
The patella (kneecap) is part of the knee’s extensor mechanism, helping the quadriceps muscle straighten the knee. In some knee replacements, surgeons resurface the back of the patella with a polyethylene (plastic) component called a patellar button. Patellar button sizing helps the surgical team choose an implant that fits the patient’s anatomy and supports smooth motion between the patella and the femur (thighbone).
At a high level, Patellar button sizing is used to:
- Restore functional anatomy: Resurfacing typically involves removing a measured amount of bone and cartilage from the back of the patella, then replacing it with an implant. Sizing aims to maintain a reasonable overall patellar thickness and shape for that individual knee.
- Support patellar tracking: “Tracking” describes how the patella glides in the femoral trochlear groove as the knee bends and straightens. Sizing (along with implant position and soft-tissue balance) is one factor that can influence tracking.
- Reduce mechanical mismatch: An implant that is too large, too small, or the wrong thickness can create mismatch between the patella and surrounding structures, potentially affecting motion or load distribution. The intended benefit is a better mechanical fit.
- Integrate with the rest of the knee replacement: Patellar resurfacing interacts with femoral and tibial component alignment, joint line position, and ligament/soft-tissue balance. Sizing is part of building a coherent overall reconstruction.
It’s important to note that whether to resurface the patella at all varies by surgeon preference, implant system, and patient-specific findings. When resurfacing is chosen, Patellar button sizing becomes a key planning and intraoperative step.
Indications (When orthopedic clinicians use it)
Patellar button sizing is typically considered in scenarios such as:
- Total knee arthroplasty where patellar resurfacing is planned
- Revision knee arthroplasty when a prior patellar component is worn, loose, malpositioned, or damaged
- Knees with patellofemoral cartilage damage (wear behind the kneecap) noted on imaging or at surgery
- Cases where the surgeon wants to optimize patellofemoral mechanics during reconstruction
- Situations where intraoperative assessment suggests resurfacing may improve implant compatibility or contact mechanics (varies by clinician and case)
Contraindications / when it’s NOT ideal
Patellar button sizing is only relevant when a patellar implant is being considered. Even then, resurfacing and implant selection may be less suitable in certain contexts, including:
- Active infection in or around the knee joint (implant procedures are generally deferred until infection is addressed)
- Severely compromised patellar bone stock, such as very thin patella after prior surgery or significant bone loss (implant fixation and fracture risk considerations vary by case)
- Extensor mechanism disruption (for example, significant quadriceps or patellar tendon problems) where priorities may shift to restoring tendon function and stability
- Poor soft-tissue envelope or wound-healing concerns, where minimizing additional surgical steps may be considered (varies by clinician and case)
- Certain patellar shapes or sizes where available implant geometries do not provide an acceptable fit (varies by material and manufacturer)
- Situations where the surgeon selects a non-resurfacing approach and instead performs patellar shaping/denervation or leaves native cartilage in place (practice patterns vary)
How it works (Mechanism / physiology)
Patellar button sizing does not “work” like a medication or injection; it is a biomechanical matching process intended to support joint mechanics after knee arthroplasty. The closest relevant concept is restoring appropriate patellofemoral geometry so that forces across the kneecap and femur are handled in a predictable way.
Key anatomy and mechanics involved include:
- Patella (kneecap): A sesamoid bone embedded in the quadriceps tendon. It increases the quadriceps’ leverage and guides force through the extensor mechanism.
- Femur (thighbone) and trochlear groove: The patella glides in the femoral trochlea during knee motion. In total knee arthroplasty, the femoral component replaces the end of the femur, including the trochlear surface that interacts with the patella.
- Tibia (shinbone): The tibial component affects overall knee alignment and joint line position, which can indirectly influence patellar mechanics.
- Articular cartilage: Normally provides a smooth surface. In arthritis, cartilage wear can make motion rough and painful. A patellar button replaces the worn cartilage surface on the back of the patella when resurfacing is done.
- Retinaculum and surrounding soft tissues: The medial and lateral retinacula, capsule, and muscle forces guide tracking. Soft-tissue balance can be as important as implant size.
What “sizing” typically means in practice:
- Diameter/footprint (overall size): The implant should fit on the resected patellar surface without excessive overhang (which may irritate soft tissue) and without being so small that it leaves large areas uncovered. Exact thresholds and preferences vary by clinician and case.
- Thickness: Resurfacing removes bone and cartilage, then replaces that volume with an implant. Thickness selection aims to avoid major changes to the overall thickness of the patella-extensor mechanism unit. Too much thickness can “overstuff” the patellofemoral joint, while too little can reduce bony support; these are general concepts rather than universal outcomes.
- Medial-lateral position and rotation (placement): Even with the same size, position on the patella can alter tracking and contact patterns. Many systems allow slight medialization or adjustment depending on anatomy.
Onset, duration, and reversibility:
- Onset: Any mechanical effect of sizing is immediate once the implant is in place, but patient-perceived recovery depends on the broader knee replacement recovery process.
- Duration: The intended mechanical relationship persists as long as the implant remains stable and the surrounding reconstruction remains balanced. Longevity varies by individual, implant design, alignment, activity, and other factors.
- Reversibility: Sizing itself is not reversible without another operation. If problems occur, revision strategies depend on the cause (e.g., maltracking, loosening, wear) and are case-specific.
Patellar button sizing Procedure overview (How it’s applied)
Patellar button sizing is not a separate procedure; it is a decision-making and intraoperative workflow step within knee arthroplasty (most often primary total knee arthroplasty, sometimes revision surgery). A general, high-level sequence commonly looks like this:
-
Evaluation / exam
Clinicians assess knee pain patterns, function, alignment, prior surgeries, and patellofemoral symptoms (such as pain with stairs or rising from a chair). The physical exam may include checking patellar mobility, tracking, and overall limb alignment. -
Imaging / diagnostics
Standard knee X-rays are typically used for arthritis and alignment assessment. Other imaging may be used depending on the clinical context. Imaging supports overall surgical planning but does not “select the button” by itself. -
Preparation (surgical planning and implant selection)
The surgeon selects an implant system and decides whether patellar resurfacing is planned. Available patellar button options depend on the manufacturer (diameters, thicknesses, peg configurations, and shapes). -
Intervention / intraoperative sizing and trialing
During knee arthroplasty, the patella may be prepared by removing a measured amount of bone and remaining cartilage from its underside. The surgeon uses measuring tools and/or trial components to evaluate:
- Patellar thickness before and after preparation
- Fit of the trial button on the cut surface
- Patellar tracking through knee range of motion after femoral and tibial components are in place
-
Immediate checks (tracking, stability, and motion)
The surgical team assesses patellofemoral tracking and overall knee mechanics. If tracking is not satisfactory, adjustments may involve implant position, soft-tissue balancing, or reconsideration of the patellar plan. The specific options depend on the case and implant system. -
Follow-up / rehab context
After surgery, rehabilitation focuses on swelling control, restoring motion, rebuilding strength, and improving gait. Patellar button sizing itself does not create a separate aftercare pathway; it is part of the overall knee arthroplasty recovery process.
Types / variations
Patellar button sizing varies because implant designs and surgical philosophies vary. Common variations include:
- Resurfacing vs non-resurfacing approaches
- Resurfacing: The patellar button is implanted, so sizing is required.
-
Non-resurfacing: No button is implanted; surgeons may still manage patellar cartilage and tracking with other techniques. Whether resurfacing is used varies by clinician and case.
-
Button geometry and conformity
- Dome-shaped (all-polyethylene) buttons: Common in many systems; designed to articulate with the femoral trochlea.
-
Anatomic or asymmetric designs: Some implants are shaped to better match typical patellar anatomy. Availability varies by manufacturer.
-
Fixation and peg configuration
Patellar buttons commonly use cemented fixation with pegs. Peg number, position, and shape differ among systems, influencing how the surgeon prepares the bone and selects size. -
Diameter and thickness options
Manufacturers provide a range of diameters and thicknesses. Sizing involves choosing a combination that fits the resected patella and supports desired overall thickness. Exact option sets vary by material and manufacturer. -
Primary vs revision patellar components
Revision situations may involve different constraints, such as altered bone stock, prior peg holes, or the need for specialized components (availability and choices vary widely).
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Supports a structured, measurable approach to patellar resurfacing decisions during knee arthroplasty
- Aims to match implant footprint to patient anatomy to reduce overhang or undersizing concerns
- Helps the surgeon consider overall patellar thickness as part of patellofemoral mechanics
- Integrates patellar resurfacing with tracking assessment during range-of-motion checks
- Can be adapted to different implant systems and patient anatomies (within manufacturer limits)
Cons:
- Sizing is not a guarantee of symptom relief or ideal tracking; outcomes depend on multiple surgical and patient factors
- Implant options are limited to the manufacturer’s sizes and designs, which may not perfectly match every patella
- Decisions may be more complex in revision cases with bone loss or prior hardware/holes
- Mis-sizing or suboptimal positioning can contribute to patellofemoral mismatch, potentially affecting comfort or function
- The process depends on intraoperative judgment and technique, which can vary by clinician and case
Aftercare & longevity
Aftercare following patellar resurfacing (and therefore Patellar button sizing) is generally the aftercare of the overall knee replacement. Longevity and patient experience are influenced by a combination of surgical, implant, and patient factors rather than size alone.
Common factors that may affect outcomes over time include:
- Overall knee alignment and component positioning: Patellar mechanics depend on how femoral and tibial components are positioned, as well as how the patellar component is placed.
- Soft-tissue balance and muscle function: Quadriceps strength, coordination, and soft-tissue tension around the patella influence tracking and loading.
- Bone quality and patellar thickness: Adequate bony support and stable fixation matter for long-term performance; what is “adequate” varies by clinician and case.
- Rehabilitation participation and functional recovery: Regaining motion, strength, and gait control can shape how loads pass through the patellofemoral joint during daily activities.
- Activity profile and overall health: Higher-impact activities, body weight changes, inflammatory conditions, and other comorbidities can affect joint loading and comfort. The degree of impact varies across individuals.
- Implant material and design choices: Wear characteristics and fixation performance can differ among designs and manufacturers.
When issues arise after knee arthroplasty—such as persistent anterior knee pain, stiffness, or a sense of catching—clinicians typically evaluate the entire knee replacement construct (not only the patellar button). The relevance of sizing versus other factors is determined case by case.
Alternatives / comparisons
Patellar button sizing is specific to patellar resurfacing in knee arthroplasty. Alternatives are best understood as alternatives to resurfacing, alternatives to surgery, or alternative ways of addressing patellofemoral symptoms.
Common comparisons include:
- Patellar resurfacing (with sizing) vs no resurfacing
- With resurfacing: Requires Patellar button sizing and implantation, aiming to replace the damaged patellar cartilage surface.
-
Without resurfacing: Avoids adding a patellar implant and preserves native bone and cartilage, though cartilage may already be arthritic. Choice varies by clinician and case.
-
Observation/monitoring and nonoperative care (before arthroplasty is considered)
For knee arthritis and patellofemoral pain patterns, clinicians may use education, activity modification, and monitoring. This does not address advanced joint surface loss the way arthroplasty does, but may be part of the overall care pathway. -
Physical therapy vs procedural interventions
Rehabilitation can improve strength, mechanics, and symptoms for many knee conditions. It does not replace joint surfaces, but it may improve function and tolerance of daily activities. -
Medications or injections vs arthroplasty strategies
Medications and injections may help some people manage pain and inflammation. They do not involve patellar implant sizing and do not rebuild the joint surface, but may delay or reduce the need for surgery in some scenarios (varies by clinician and case). -
Other surgical procedures vs knee replacement
Some patients undergo procedures aimed at alignment or patellar tracking (depending on diagnosis). These are distinct from knee replacement and from Patellar button sizing, and the appropriate choice depends on the underlying condition and joint status.
Patellar button sizing Common questions (FAQ)
Q: Is Patellar button sizing the same as choosing a knee replacement size?
Patellar button sizing refers specifically to selecting the patellar resurfacing component, not the femoral or tibial components. It is one part of the overall implant selection and balancing process in total knee arthroplasty. The best fit is determined in the context of the whole reconstruction.
Q: Does Patellar button sizing affect pain after knee replacement?
Sizing is intended to support smooth patellofemoral mechanics, which can influence comfort in some patients. However, pain after surgery depends on many factors, including soft-tissue healing, overall implant alignment, strength recovery, and individual pain sensitivity. The contribution of sizing alone varies by clinician and case.
Q: Is the patellar button put in during every total knee replacement?
No. Some surgeons resurface the patella routinely, while others do so selectively or not at all. The decision depends on the surgeon’s approach, implant system, and patient-specific findings.
Q: Does Patellar button sizing change how the knee tracks or feels when bending?
It can. The patella’s motion depends on the shape and position of the patellar component, the trochlear surface of the femoral component, and surrounding soft tissues. Sizing is one factor among several that may influence tracking and the sensation of movement.
Q: Is anesthesia related to Patellar button sizing?
Patellar button sizing is done during knee arthroplasty, so it falls under the anesthesia plan for that operation. The type of anesthesia used for knee replacement varies by institution, anesthesiologist, and patient factors. Sizing itself does not require a separate anesthesia method.
Q: How long does a patellar button last?
Longevity depends on many variables, including implant design, fixation, alignment, patient activity, and overall knee mechanics. Some implants perform well for long periods, while others may require evaluation or revision if problems develop. Exact duration varies by material and manufacturer and by individual factors.
Q: What are common complications related to the patellar button?
Potential concerns discussed in clinical settings include maltracking, loosening, wear, fracture risk in compromised bone, and persistent anterior knee pain. Not all symptoms are caused by the patellar component, and clinicians typically assess the entire knee replacement when symptoms persist. The likelihood and relevance of each issue vary by case.
Q: Will Patellar button sizing change the recovery timeline?
Recovery is generally dictated by the overall knee replacement procedure rather than the sizing step itself. Rehabilitation focuses on regaining motion, strength, and function. Individual recovery speed varies widely.
Q: Can I drive or return to work sooner if the patellar button is sized “correctly”?
Sizing is one element of surgery quality, but return to driving or work depends on pain control, mobility, strength, reaction time, the operated side, job demands, and clinician clearance. These decisions are individualized and not determined by patellar sizing alone. Expectations vary by clinician and case.
Q: What does Patellar button sizing mean for cost?
Costs are influenced by the overall knee arthroplasty episode, including facility fees, surgeon fees, anesthesia, implants, and rehabilitation services. A patellar component may be included in the implant system cost structure depending on hospital contracts and billing practices. Out-of-pocket costs vary by insurer, region, and care setting.